Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6vsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020

50 TDI V6

286 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv G

284 hp3283 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    286 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,935 kg
    4,266 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,014 km
    630 mi
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
286hp213kW
284hp212kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,935kg4,266lb
1,949kg4,297lb
Gross weight
2,645kg5,831lb
2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
22.7s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,014km630mi
Calculated
784km487mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
4,682mm184in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,688mm66in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance-
179mm7in
Trunk volume
520L
477L
Max trunk volume
1,520L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
58L
CO2 emissions-
171g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V63,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G5,000-6,000 rpm2,000-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.7 s
34.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
286 hp
213 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 has 2 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
1,935 kg
4,266 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
1,949 kg
4,297 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
240 km/h
149 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V65.7 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
1,014 km
630 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
784 km
487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
286 hp
213 kW
5.7 s
240 km/h
149 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW
6.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.7 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
286 hp
213 kW
284 hp
212 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
6.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,935 kg
4,266 lb
1,949 kg
4,297 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in
Range score
1,014 km
630 mi
784 km
487 mi
CO2 score
-
171 g/km
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 170 Nm more
  • Is 14 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 231 km (143 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 43 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI V6
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

50 TDI V6
50 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
50 TDI V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
50 TDI V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Standard Range 60 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh
50 TDI V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
50 TDI V6
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
50 TDI V6
50 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
EQE 350+ 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 T4
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
50 TDI V6
50 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6vsAUDIQ650 TFSI V6
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster