AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6vsAUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R)
3.2 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score88/100
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,935kg4,266lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Gross weight | 2,645kg5,831lb | 2,415kg5,324lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 29.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 3,197cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,653mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,613mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 29.3 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 has 16 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 5.7 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 806 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6 | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 806 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6 | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 50 TDI V6
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 290 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 208 km (129 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























