AUDI Q5 I (8R)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6vsMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLK (X204)
GLK 350 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,755 kg3,869 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 270hp201kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,415kg5,324lb | 2,480kg5,467lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 611km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,197cc195cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,525mm178in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,653mm65in | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,588mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 has 2 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 806 km 501 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 611 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 350 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 270 hp 201 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 611 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6 | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 3.2 FSI V6
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 350 V6
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























