Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4vsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Tonale

2.0 T4

272 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-2025
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv G

284 hp3283 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph Unrestricted
    225 km/h
    140 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    170 hp/t
    127 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Most powerful
    284 hp
    212 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    784 km
    487 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
272hp203kW
284hp212kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,949kg4,297lb
Gross weight
2,250kg4,960lb
2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
69.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
25.8s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
520km323mi
Calculated
784km487mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
4,527mm178in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,657mm65in
1,688mm66in
Wheelbase
2,635mm104in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,574mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,573mm62in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
179mm7in
Trunk volume
500L
477L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
58L
CO2 emissions-
171g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T45,200 rpm3,000 rpm5,450 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G5,000-6,000 rpm2,000-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.8 s
34.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has 12 hp more than Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
1,949 kg
4,297 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T46.5 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G6.9 s

Although Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has more power, Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
520 km
323 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
784 km
487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW
6.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
6.5 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
272 hp
203 kW
284 hp
212 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,949 kg
4,297 lb
Fuel consumption
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in
Range score
520 km
323 mi
784 km
487 mi
CO2 score
-
171 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.15 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.60 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,573 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Is 349 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 263 km (164 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T4
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 T4
Veloce 54 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoJuniorVeloce 54 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T4
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Standard Range 60 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 60 kWh
2.0 T4
2.0 GME
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
50 TDI V6
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
EQE 350+ 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 350+ 100 kWh
2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
50 TDI V6
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster