Car comparison

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tayron II

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Alfa Romeo Tonale

2.0 T4

272 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    674 km
    419 mi
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Most powerful
    272 hp
    203 kW
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    170 hp/t
    127 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
265hp198kW
272hp203kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,734kg3,823lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight
2,310kg5,093lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
69.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
22.1s
Calculated
25.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
674km419mi
Calculated
520km323mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,792mm189in
4,527mm178in
Width
1,866mm73in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,666mm66in
1,657mm65in
Wheelbase
2,790mm110in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,574mm62in
Rear track
1,578mm62in
1,573mm62in
Ground clearance-
212mm8in
Trunk volume
345L
500L
Max trunk volume
2,090L
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI5,000 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm5,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T45,200 rpm3,000 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.1 s
25.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has 7 hp more than Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
1,734 kg
3,823 lb
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI6.1 s
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T46.5 s

Although Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has more power, Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
674 km
419 mi
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
520 km
323 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
345 L
12.2 cu ft
Length
4,792 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.1 s
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
265 hp
198 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,734 kg
3,823 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
345 L
12.2 cu ft
Length
4,792 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in
Range score
674 km
419 mi
520 km
323 mi
Trunk score
345 L
12.2 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.05 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.22 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,258 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 154 km (96 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 134 kg lighter
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 155 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 T4
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron X380TSI
2.0 T4
Veloce 54 kWh
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoJuniorVeloce 54 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
2.0 Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.0 Turbo
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T4
2.0 GME
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4vsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
450TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI vs Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster