Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivvsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 Skyactiv-X
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque261 Nm193 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range3,333 km2,071 mi
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Lightest1,491 kg3,287 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 261Nm193lb-ft | 224Nm165lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,072kg4,568lb | 1,491kg3,287lb |
| Gross weight | 2,667kg5,880lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 79.2s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.7s Calculated | 66.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton Calculated | 150Nm/t101lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 3,333km2,071mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,488cc152cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,685mm66in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 118g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 6,000 rpm | - | 6,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.7 s | 66.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Limited | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 12 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 261 Nm 193 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 2,072 kg 4,568 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 1,491 kg 3,287 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 5.8 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 3.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 3,333 km 2,071 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 192 hp 143 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.8 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv |
| 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 261 Nm 193 lb-ft | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,072 kg 4,568 lb | 1,491 kg 3,287 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.5 L/100 km 156.8 mpg US 188.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 3,333 km 2,071 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 118 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv | Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 2.63 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 4.22 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 225 L59 US gal49 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 393.75 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 37 Nm more
- Is 3.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2,353 km (1,462 mi) more estimated range
- Has 47 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Is 581 kg lighter
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























