Peugeot 2008 II
Car comparison
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTechvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.1 s
- Fastest top speed198 km/h123 mph
- Highest torque230 Nm170 lb-ft
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,023 km636 mi
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score39/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 130hp97kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 213Nm157lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,477kg3,256lb |
| Gross weight | 1,752kg3,862lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 198 km/h 123 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph Calculated | 78.6s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 9.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,023km636mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,199cc73cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,300mm169in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,550mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,605mm103in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,467L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
| Top speed | 198 km/h 123 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 130 hp 97 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G has 20 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 213 Nm 157 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 1,477 kg 3,256 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 198 km/h 123 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 195 km/h 121 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 9.1 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 9.1 s |
Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G has more power, Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 1,023 km 636 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 130 hp 97 kW | 9.1 s | 198 km/h 123 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 130 hp 97 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 213 Nm 157 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 198 km/h 123 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,477 kg 3,256 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,023 km 636 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
- Has 17 Nm more
- Is 272 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 134 km (83 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























