BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 18dvsPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 2008 II
1.2 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.1 s
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,023 km636 mi
- Best economy score95/100
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Fastest top speed206 km/h128 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)18d | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 130hp97kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 1,752kg3,862lb |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated | 78.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.2s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 62.7s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.7s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.7s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 981km609mi Calculated | 1,023km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,300mm169in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,605mm103in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,467L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 18d: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)18d | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.7 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.2 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 62.7 s | - |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.1 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.7 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 130 hp 97 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 18d has 20 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 198 km/h 123 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 9.2 s |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 9.1 s |
Although BMW X2 (F39) 18d has more power, Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 981 km 609 mi |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 1,023 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 130 hp 97 kW | 9.1 s | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 18d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)18d | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 130 hp 97 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.2 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 981 km 609 mi | 1,023 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 18d | Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
- Is 375 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























