BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 18dvsBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014 28d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25 LCI) · Facelift 2014
28d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight96 hp/t72 kW/t10.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score86/100
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Fastest top speed206 km/h128 mph
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range981 km609 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)18d | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,919kg4,231lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,341kg5,161lb |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated | 92.5s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 62.7s Calculated | 75.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.7s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t72kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 981km609mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,668mm184in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,678mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 18d: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)18d | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 62.7 s | 75.9 s |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.1 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d has 34 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 18d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 18d and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 9.2 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 18d and BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 981 km 609 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.3 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)18d | BMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 981 km 609 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 18d | BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Is 339 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 122 km (76 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X3 (F25 LCI) Facelift 2014 28d
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























