BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 18dvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
GLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Fastest top speed206 km/h128 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight95 hp/t71 kW/t10.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range981 km609 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)18d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated | 84.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.2s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 62.7s Calculated | 65.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.7s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.7s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 981km609mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,611mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 18d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)18d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.2 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 62.7 s | 65.9 s |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.1 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.7 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 9.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d and BMW X2 (F39) 18d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 981 km 609 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 18d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)18d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)18d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.2 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 981 km 609 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 18d | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 18d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























