Car comparison

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GvsPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present
VS

Peugeot 2008 II

1.2 PureTech

130 hp1199 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech

  • Highest torque
    230 Nm
    170 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    108 hp/t
    80 kW/t
    9.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.9 L/100 km
    60.3 mpg US
    72.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,023 km
    636 mi
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    198 km/h
    123 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    40/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Power
150hp112kW
130hp97kW
Torque
213Nm157lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,407kg3,102lb
1,205kg2,657lb
Gross weight
1,927kg4,248lb
1,752kg3,862lb
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
To 99% top speed
77.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
78.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
9.1s
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
981km609mi
Calculated
1,023km636mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,199cc73cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,300mm169in
Width
1,795mm71in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,540mm61in
1,550mm61in
Wheelbase
2,655mm105in
2,605mm103in
Front track-
1,540mm61in
Rear track-
1,540mm61in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
-
Trunk volume
430L
405L
Max trunk volume
1,406L
1,467L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
44L
CO2 emissions-
109g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTechPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
  • Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
9.1 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
130 hp
97 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G has 20 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech.

The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
1,205 kg
2,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
198 km/h
123 mph
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
198 km/h
123 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G8.8 s
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech9.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G and Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
981 km
609 mi
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
1,023 km
636 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
198 km/h
123 mph
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
130 hp
97 kW
9.1 s
198 km/h
123 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Power
130 hp
97 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,300 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Power
130 hp
97 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
9.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Power
150 hp
112 kW
130 hp
97 kW
Torque
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
9.1 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Lightness
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,300 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Range score
981 km
609 mi
1,023 km
636 mi
CO2 score
-
109 g/km
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
108 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km7.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi12.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal645 L170 US gal142 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,129 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech

  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Is 202 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.2 PureTech
1.2
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.2 PureTech
1.6
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.2 PureTech
GLB 200d
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.2 PureTech
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1.2 PureTech
18d
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsBMWX2 (F39)18d
1.2 PureTech
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G vs Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech - car comparison - FastVsFaster