Maserati 3200 GT
Car comparison
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VvsTVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTVR Cerbera
4.2 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight327 hp/t244 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score72/100
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque491 Nm362 lb-ft
- Best estimated range600 km373 mi
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 434Nm320lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,100kg2,425lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 51.0s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | 500km311mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 4,185cc255cu in |
| Length | 4,510mm178in | 4,280mm169in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,220mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,566mm101in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,464mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
- TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has 10 hp more than TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 5.1 s |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 4.2 s |
Although Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has more power, TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 600 km 373 mi |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.2 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 289 km/h 180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | 500 km 311 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 57 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
- Is 490 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 95 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























