Maserati 3200 GT
Car comparison
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VvsMaserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Ghibli II
2.0 24V Biturbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque491 Nm362 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Lowest city consumption16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 373Nm275lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,365kg3,009lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 19.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 1,996cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,510mm178in | 4,223mm166in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,775mm70in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,514mm99in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,510mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 6,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 19.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 171 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 306 hp 228 kW |
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has 64 hp more than Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 64 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 265 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 5.1 s |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V and Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.7 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiGhibli II2.0 24V Biturbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 265 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Has 64 hp more
- Has 118 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Ghibli II 2.0 24V Biturbo
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























