TVR Cerbera
Car comparison
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8vsMercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999
AMG CLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed289 km/h180 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight327 hp/t244 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range530 km329 mi
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 434Nm320lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,100kg2,425lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.0s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,185cc255cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,280mm169in | 4,567mm180in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,722mm68in |
| Height | 1,220mm48in | 1,371mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,566mm101in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,464mm58in | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 420L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.2 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.75 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,413 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 445 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 103 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 76 Nm more
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























