Car comparison

TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8vsMercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

TVR Cerbera

4.2 i V8

360 hp4185 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1998-2003
VS

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999

AMG CLK 55 V8

347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe1999-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    289 km/h
    180 mph
  • Most powerful
    360 hp
    268 kW
  • Lightest
    1,100 kg
    2,425 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    327 hp/t
    244 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelTVRCerbera4.2 i V8Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
360hp268kW
347hp259kW
Torque
434Nm320lb-ft
510Nm376lb-ft
Curb weight
1,100kg2,425lb
1,545kg3,406lb
Gross weight-
1,960kg4,321lb
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
51.0s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
69.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.4s
0-200 km/h
12.2s
Calculated
18.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
13.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
225hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton
Calculated
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
500km311mi
Calculated
530km329mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,185cc255cu in
5,439cc332cu in
Length
4,280mm169in
4,567mm180in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,722mm68in
Height
1,220mm48in
1,371mm54in
Wheelbase
2,566mm101in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,464mm58in
1,505mm59in
Rear track
1,470mm58in
1,488mm59in
Trunk volume
390L
420L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
65L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8PowerTorque
  • TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
TVRCerbera4.2 i V86,500 rpm4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V85,500 rpm3,000-4,300 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricTVRCerbera4.2 i V8Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.2 s
18.3 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
13.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
198 km/h
123 mph
174 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
360 hp
268 kW
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW

TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
434 Nm
320 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
510 Nm
376 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
1,100 kg
2,425 lb
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
1,545 kg
3,406 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
289 km/h
180 mph
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
225 hp/t
167 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
500 km
311 mi
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
530 km
329 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
360 hp
268 kW
4.2 s
289 km/h
180 mph
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,280 mm
168.5 in
Height
1,220 mm
48.0 in
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,371 mm
54.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
4.2 s
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
5.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
TVRCerbera4.2 i V8
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
225 hp/t
167 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleTVRCerbera4.2 i V8Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
360 hp
268 kW
347 hp
259 kW
Torque
434 Nm
320 lb-ft
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.4 s
Top speed
289 km/h
180 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,100 kg
2,425 lb
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
Fuel consumption
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,280 mm
168.5 in
Height
1,220 mm
48.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,371 mm
54.0 in
Range score
500 km
311 mi
530 km
329 mi
Trunk score
390 L
13.8 cu ft
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
327 hp/t
244 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
225 hp/t
167 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleTVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
Consumption13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.75 LC100 km20.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.61 LC100 mi32.95 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,413 LC/year3,071 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Is 445 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 103 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8

  • Has 76 Nm more
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 30 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 vs Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster