Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005
AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
507 hp6208 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2007-2009
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsMercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) · Facelift 1999
AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe1999-2002
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight301 hp/t224 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range530 km329 mi
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.3L/100 km10.1mpg US12.1mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 405km252mi Calculated | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,567mm180in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 1,722mm68in |
| Height | 1,365mm54in | 1,371mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,488mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 420L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8PowerTorque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 has 160 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: 160 hp (119 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 405 km 252 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
| 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 405 km 252 mi | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.78 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.09 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,295 L606 US gal505 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,016 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
- Has 160 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 76 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 125 km (77 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C208) AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999CLK 430
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 55 V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 63 V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Black Series V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsBMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 Performance Package V8