TVR Cerbera
Car comparison
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8vsBMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed289 km/h180 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight327 hp/t244 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 434Nm320lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,100kg2,425lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.7s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,185cc255cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,280mm169in | 4,025mm158in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,220mm48in | 1,280mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,566mm101in | 2,459mm97in |
| Front track | 1,464mm58in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,492mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 210L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 410L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: Power / Torque
- BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 123 mph | 176 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 325 hp 242 kW |
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 has 35 hp more than BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2 and TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 4.2 s |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 and BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.2 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 84 Nm more
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 91 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 180 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























