BMW M3 Coupe (E46)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24VvsBMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score56/100
BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight236 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.6 L/100 km14.2 mpg US17.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.8s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 229hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 529km329mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,492mm177in | 4,025mm158in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,280mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,731mm108in | 2,459mm97in |
| Front track | 1,508mm59in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,492mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 210L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 410L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
- BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.8 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 176 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 325 hp 242 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V has 18 hp more than BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2 and BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.2 s |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V and BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | BMWZ3 M Coupe (E36/8)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 529 km 329 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW Z3 M Coupe (E36/8) 3.2
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























