Maserati 3200 GT
Car comparison
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32VvsMaserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Shamal
3.2 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque491 Nm362 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Lightest1,417 kg3,124 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.2 L/100 km10.6 mpg US12.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 436Nm322lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,417kg3,124lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 3,217cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,510mm178in | 4,100mm161in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V has 44 hp more than Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 44 hp (33 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 5.1 s |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 600 km 373 mi |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Has 44 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Is 173 kg lighter
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 96 km (59 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























