Maserati Shamal
Car comparison
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32VvsFerrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 348 TB
3.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Highest torque436 Nm322 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
- Lightest1,393 kg3,071 lb
- Lowest city consumption19.6 L/100 km12.0 mpg US14.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range760 km472 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326hp243kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 436Nm322lb-ft | 324Nm239lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,417kg3,124lb | 1,393kg3,071lb |
| Gross weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.2s Calculated | 18.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 760km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 3,405cc208cu in |
| Length | 4,100mm161in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,170mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,502mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,550mm61in | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 200L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 7,200 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.2 s | 18.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V has 26 hp more than Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 1,393 kg 3,071 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 696 km 432 mi |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 760 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.6 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp 243 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb | 1,393 kg 3,071 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 760 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V | Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 112 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 220 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
- Is 24 kg lighter
- Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























