Porsche 911 (964)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (964) Turbo 3.3vsMaserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Shamal
3.2 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (964) Turbo 3.3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption21.0 L/100 km11.2 mpg US13.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score71/100
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Lightest1,417 kg3,124 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 436Nm322lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,417kg3,124lb |
| Gross weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21L/100 km11.2mpg US13.5mpg UK | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 218hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,299cc201cu in | 3,217cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,250mm167in | 4,100mm161in |
| Width | 1,775mm70in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,310mm52in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,270mm89in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,434mm56in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,493mm59in | 1,550mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 90L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 77L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (964) Turbo 3.3: Power / Torque
- Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | 5,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V has 6 hp more than Porsche 911 (964) Turbo 3.3.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (964) Turbo 3.3 and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | 5.0 s |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
Although Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V has more power, Porsche 911 (964) Turbo 3.3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (964) Turbo 3.3 and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (964)Turbo 3.3 | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 90 L 3.2 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 218 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (964) Turbo 3.3
- Has 14 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 53 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 330 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























