TVR Cerbera
Car comparison
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8vsBMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E46)
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed289 km/h180 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight327 hp/t244 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range529 km329 mi
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 343hp256kW |
| Torque | 434Nm320lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,100kg2,425lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.7s99% target: 286 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 68.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 17.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 327hp/t244kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated | 229hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | 529km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,185cc255cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,280mm169in | 4,492mm177in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,220mm48in | 1,372mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,566mm101in | 2,731mm108in |
| Front track | 1,464mm58in | 1,508mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 410L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 17.8 s |
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 123 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 has 17 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V and TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 4.2 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 and BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V and TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 529 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.2 s | 289 km/h 180 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRCerbera4.2 i V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 343 hp 256 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 289 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | 529 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 327 hp/t 244 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8 | BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.75 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,413 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Cerbera 4.2 i V8
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 69 Nm more
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 98 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























