Car comparison

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 900

EM-P 2.0T

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023

GLB 250

224 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2026

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.3 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    823 km
    511 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
Power
254hp189kW
224hp167kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,810kg6,195lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Gross weight
3,345kg7,374lb
2,265kg4,993lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
73.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
78.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
21.7s
Calculated
28.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.3mpg US38.7mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
90hp/t67kW/t41hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
125Nm/t83lb-ft/ton
Calculated
207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
823km511mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,991cc121cu in
Length
5,240mm206in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,999mm79in
1,834mm72in
Height
1,810mm71in
1,697mm67in
Wheelbase
3,160mm124in
2,829mm111in
Front track
1,722mm68in
1,604mm63in
Rear track
1,724mm68in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance
194mm8in
135mm5in
Trunk volume
300L
565L
Max trunk volume
1,070L
1,800L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250PowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T5,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 2505,500-6,100 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.7 s
28.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
224 hp
167 kW

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T has 30 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 and Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
1,690 kg
3,726 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
240 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T4.6 s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 2507.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: 2.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
823 km
511 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
4.6 s
240 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
224 hp
167 kW
7.0 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
4.6 s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
Power
254 hp
189 kW
224 hp
167 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
7.0 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
2,810 kg
6,195 lb
1,690 kg
3,726 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in
Range score
823 km
511 mi
714 km
444 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.76 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.53 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,094 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,914 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250

  • Is 1,120 kg lighter
  • Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 265 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
GLB 250
GLB 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
EM-P 2.0T
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
GLB 250
GLB 200 58 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 200 58 kWh
EM-P 2.0T
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
GLB 250
GLA 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
GLB 250
GLA 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
GLB 250
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 350d
EM-P 2.0T
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T vs Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster