Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

P 340 3.0 V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    181 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    910 km
    566 mi
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6

  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,954 kg
    4,308 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    174 hp/t
    130 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
Power
310hp231kW
340hp254kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
2,016kg4,445lb
1,954kg4,308lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
71.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
77.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
23.9s
Calculated
28.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
872km542mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,995cc183cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,902mm75in
-
Height
1,658mm65in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track-
1,644mm65in
Rear track-
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
505L
673L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
82L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
214g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V66,500 rpm4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.9 s
28.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6 has 30 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
1,954 kg
4,308 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V66.4 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
872 km
542 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
6.4 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
340 hp
254 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
1,954 kg
4,308 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
872 km
542 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
214 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
174 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 33 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 62 kg lighter
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 168 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
P 340 3.0 V6
40i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6vsBMWX7 (G07)40i
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
P 340 3.0 V6
3.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i
2.0 T6
30t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace30t
P 340 3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6vsPorscheCayenne III3.0 V6
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
P 340 3.0 V6
3.0 TFSi V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6vsBentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6
P 340 3.0 V6
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TSI
2.0 T6
50 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
P 340 3.0 V6
55 TFSI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster