Porsche Cayenne III
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar
P 340 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions209 g/km
- Largest trunk770 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6
- Lightest1,954 kg4,308 lb
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range872 km542 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,954kg4,308lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 77.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.7s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 815km507mi Calculated | 872km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,918mm194in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,696mm67in | 1,665mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 770L | 673L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,710L | 1,731L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 214g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 5,300-6,400 rpm | 1,340-5,300 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.7 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 1,954 kg 4,308 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 6.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 815 km 507 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 872 km 542 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.4 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne III3.0 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 340 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | 1,954 kg 4,308 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 815 km 507 mi | 872 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 214 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 770 L 27.2 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6 | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III 3.0 V6
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 97 L more trunk volume
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 340 3.0 V6
- Is 31 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























