Land Rover Range Rover Velar
P 300 2.0 (Stage 3)
450 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 · Stage 3vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 · Stage 2vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 · Stage 1vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
P 300 2.0 (Stage 2)
390 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020
VS
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
P 300 2.0 (Stage 1)
354 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020
VS
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
P 300 2.0
300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed271 km/h168 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,813 kg3,997 lb
- Best power-to-weight248 hp/t185 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions178 g/km
- Best estimated range808 km502 mi
- Largest trunk673 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW+150 hp | 390hp291kW+90 hp | 354hp264kW+54 hp | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm | 540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm | 488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,813kg3,997lb | 1,813kg3,997lb | 1,813kg3,997lb | 1,813kg3,997lb |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.8s99% target: 268 km/h / 167 mph-13.5 s Calculated | 64.0s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-8.3 s Calculated | 67.3s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph-5.0 s Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s-1.3 s | 5.1s-0.9 s | 5.4s-0.6 s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.1s-10.8 s Calculated | 17.9s-8.0 s Calculated | 20.4s-5.6 s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.2s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.6s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 248hp/t185kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 195hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 342Nm/t229lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 808km502mi Calculated | 808km502mi Calculated | 808km502mi Calculated | 808km502mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,665mm66in | 1,665mm66in | 1,665mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,874mm113in | 2,874mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,663mm65in | 1,663mm65in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 251mm10in | 251mm10in | 251mm10in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 673L | 673L | 673L | 673L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,731L | 1,731L | 1,731L | 1,731L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 63L | 63L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 178g/km | 178g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hpLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 2) 390 hpLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 1) 354 hpLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 300 hpPowerTorque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hp: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 2) 390 hp: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 1) 354 hp: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 300 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.1 s | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.1 s | 17.9 s | 20.4 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s | 8.9 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.1 s | 11.4 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s | 13.6 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 450 hp 336 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 390 hp 291 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 354 hp 264 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hp has 150 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 300 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 300 hp and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hp: 150 hp (112 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hp and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 300 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 2) 390 hp and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 1) 354 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 808 km 502 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 808 km 502 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 808 km 502 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 808 km 502 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.7 s | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.1 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.4 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 3)450 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 2)390 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 (Stage 1)354 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0300 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.1 s | 5.4 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 808 km 502 mi | 808 km 502 mi | 808 km 502 mi | 808 km 502 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 195 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hp | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 2) 390 hp | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 1) 354 hp | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 300 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 3) 450 hp
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 (Stage 2) 390 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAudiQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAudiSQ22.0 TFSI
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsAudiQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI