Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 · Stage 3vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 · Stage 2vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 · Stage 1vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar
P 250 2.0 (Stage 2)
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
P 250 2.0 (Stage 1)
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
P 250 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 3) 375 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful375 hp280 kW
- Highest torque566 Nm417 lb-ft
- Lightest1,804 kg3,977 lb
- Best power-to-weight208 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions173 g/km
- Best estimated range829 km515 mi
- Largest trunk673 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375hp280kW+125 hp | 325hp242kW+75 hp | 295hp220kW+45 hp | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 566Nm417lb-ft+201 Nm | 493Nm363lb-ft+128 Nm | 445Nm328lb-ft+80 Nm | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,804kg3,977lb | 1,804kg3,977lb | 1,804kg3,977lb | 1,804kg3,977lb |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.9s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph-10.7 s Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph-5.6 s Calculated | 73.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph-2.6 s Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s-1.5 s | 5.7s-1.0 s | 6.0s-0.7 s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.8s-18.2 s Calculated | 22.7s-14.3 s Calculated | 26.2s-10.9 s Calculated | 37.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s-1.4 s Calculated | 5.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.2s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 829km515mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,665mm66in | 1,665mm66in | 1,665mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,874mm113in | 2,874mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,663mm65in | 1,663mm65in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 251mm10in | 251mm10in | 251mm10in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 673L | 673L | 673L | 673L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,731L | 1,731L | 1,731L | 1,731L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 63L | 63L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 173g/km | 173g/km | 173g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 3) 375 hp: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 2) 325 hp: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 1) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 250 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.8 s | 22.7 s | 26.2 s | 37.0 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.0 s | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.7 s | 11.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s | 14.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 375 hp 280 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 325 hp 242 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 250 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 3) 375 hp has 125 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 250 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 250 hp and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 3) 375 hp: 125 hp (93 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 566 Nm 417 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 493 Nm 363 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 445 Nm 328 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 3) 375 hp and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 250 hp: 1.5 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 2) 325 hp and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 1) 295 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 829 km 515 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 829 km 515 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 829 km 515 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 375 hp 280 kW | 5.2 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.7 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.0 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 3) 375 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 3)375 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 2)325 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 (Stage 1)295 hp | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0250 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375 hp 280 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | 295 hp 220 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 566 Nm 417 lb-ft | 493 Nm 363 lb-ft | 445 Nm 328 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | 6.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 829 km 515 mi | 829 km 515 mi | 829 km 515 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 173 g/km | 173 g/km | 173 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 3) 375 hp | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 2) 325 hp | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 1) 295 hp | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 250 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 3) 375 hp
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 73 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 (Stage 2) 325 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























