Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar
P 250 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,804 kg3,977 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions173 g/km
- Best economy score86/100
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Best estimated range915 km568 mi
- Largest trunk810 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 249hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,804kg3,977lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.6s Calculated | 37.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 915km568mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,665mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,904mm114in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 810L | 673L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,731L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 188g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.6 s | 37.0 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 249 hp 186 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 915 km 568 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 249 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 250 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 249 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb | 1,804 kg 3,977 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 915 km 568 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 188 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
- Has 137 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 250 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 151 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























