Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 3.0 D300vsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-60
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range883 km549 mi
- Largest trunk735 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
- Lightest1,949 kg4,297 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 284hp212kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,049kg4,517lb | 1,949kg4,297lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.1s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 883km549mi Calculated | 784km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 3,283cc200cu in |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,745mm187in |
| Width | 2,041mm80in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,688mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 214mm8in | 179mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 735L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,798L | 1,726L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 171g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.1 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 284 hp 212 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 has 16 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 2,049 kg 4,517 lb |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 1,949 kg 4,297 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 6.5 s |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 883 km 549 mi |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 784 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 284 hp 212 kW | 6.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 284 hp 212 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,049 kg 4,517 lb | 1,949 kg 4,297 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 883 km 549 mi | 784 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 171 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 735 L 26.0 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 99 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Has 258 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























