Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 3.0 D300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
3.0 D300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range883 km549 mi
- Largest trunk735 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 2,049kg4,517lb |
| Gross weight | 2,235kg4,927lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 651km404mi Calculated | 883km549mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,447mm175in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,645mm65in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 214mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 735L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,530L | 1,798L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 5,750-6,500 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 2,049 kg 4,517 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 and Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 651 km 404 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 883 km 549 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 D300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 2,049 kg 4,517 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 651 km 404 mi | 883 km 549 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 735 L 26.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0 | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0
- Is 389 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 D300
- Has 250 Nm more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 233 km (144 mi) more estimated range
- Has 230 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























