Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35vsMini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (U25)
JCW 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight183 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score66/100
Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range651 km404 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,235kg4,927lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 62.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 554km344mi Calculated | 651km404mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,436mm175in | 4,447mm175in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,590mm63in | 1,645mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,593mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,430L | 1,530L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 6,100 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 5,750-6,500 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 110 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35 has 6 hp more than Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 5.2 s |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35 and Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 554 km 344 mi |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 651 km 404 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | MiniCountryman (U25)JCW 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 554 km 344 mi | 651 km 404 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35 | Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mini Countryman (U25) JCW 2.0
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























