Tesla Model X
Car comparison
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score79/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
- Lightest2,310 kg5,093 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,389kg5,267lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Gross weight | 3,020kg6,658lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 840km522mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,052mm199in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,999mm79in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,965mm117in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,711mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,723mm68in | - |
| Ground clearance | 223mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 357L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,166L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 298g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 525 hp 391 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh has 15 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 and Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 2,389 kg 5,267 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 5.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,389 kg 5,267 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 840 km 522 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 298 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 357 L 12.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
- Is 79 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























