Maserati Levante
Car comparison
Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Lightest2,109 kg4,650 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions253 g/km
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score78/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque625 Nm461 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range840 km522 mi
- Best overall score79/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 430hp321kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,109kg4,650lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.4s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 64.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.7s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 734km456mi Calculated | 840km522mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,003mm197in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,968mm77in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,679mm66in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,004mm118in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,624mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,676mm66in | - |
| Trunk volume | 580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | 253g/km | 298g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 5,750 rpm | 4,500-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | - | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.7 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 430 hp 321 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 has 80 hp more than Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 2,109 kg 4,650 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 5.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 has more power, Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 734 km 456 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 840 km 522 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 430 hp 321 kW | 5.2 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiLevanteS 3.0 V6 GDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 430 hp 321 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,109 kg 4,650 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 734 km 456 mi | 840 km 522 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 253 g/km | 298 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Levante S 3.0 V6 GDI
- Is 201 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 45 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 106 km (66 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























