Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II

Turbo 4.8 V8

500 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2010-2014

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8

Quickest 0-100 km/h
4.7 s
Fastest top speed
278 km/h
173 mph
Highest torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Lightest
2,170 kg
4,784 lb
Best power-to-weight
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
270 g/km
Best overall score
85/100
Best performance score
82/100
Best economy score
76/100
Best practicality score
91/100

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8

Most powerful
510 hp
380 kW
Best estimated range
840 km
522 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power	500hp373kW	510hp380kW
Torque	700Nm516lb-ft	625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight	2,170kg4,784lb	2,310kg5,093lb
Gross weight	2,880kg6,349lb	-
Top speed	278 km/h 173 mph	Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	67.1s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated	64.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	4.7s	5.3s
0-200 km/h	15.5s Calculated	22.8s Calculated
0-60 mph	4.5s Calculated	5.0s Calculated
Fuel consumption	11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK	12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK	-
Fuel consumption highway	8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK	-
Quarter mile	12.8s Calculated	13.6s Calculated
Power-to-weight	230hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated	221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated	271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	739km459mi Calculated	840km522mi Calculated
Displacement	4,806cc293cu in	5,000cc305cu in
Length	4,846mm191in	4,850mm191in
Width	1,939mm76in	1,983mm78in
Height	1,705mm67in	1,780mm70in
Wheelbase	2,895mm114in	2,923mm115in
Front track	1,655mm65in	-
Rear track	1,669mm66in	-
Ground clearance	215mm8in	-
Trunk volume	670L	-
Max trunk volume	1,780L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	85L	105L
CO2 emissions	270g/km	298g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	6,000 rpm	2,250-4,500 rpm	6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	-	2,500-5,500 rpm	5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	4.5 s	5.0 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	4.7 s	5.3 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	15.5 s	22.8 s
Top speed	278 km/h 173 mph	Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.1 s	2.2 s
330 ft 101 m	5.6 s	5.8 s
1/8 mile 201 m	8.4 s	8.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	10.8 s	11.4 s
1/4 mile 402 m	12.8 s	13.6 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	183 km/h 114 mph	166 km/h 103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	500 hp 373 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	510 hp 380 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 has 10 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	700 Nm 516 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	625 Nm 461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	2,170 kg 4,784 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	2,310 kg 5,093 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	278 km/h 173 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	4.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	5.3 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	739 km 459 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	840 km 522 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	500 hp 373 kW	4.7 s	278 km/h 173 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	510 hp 380 kW	5.3 s	Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8

Power	500 hp 373 kW
0-100 km/h	4.7 s
Top speed 278 km/h 173 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	670 L 23.7 cu ft
Length	4,846 mm 190.8 in
Height	1,705 mm 67.1 in

Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8

Power	510 hp 380 kW
0-100 km/h	5.3 s
Top speed Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,850 mm 190.9 in
Height	1,780 mm 70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8

Power	500 hp 373 kW
0-100 km/h	4.7 s
Top speed 278 km/h 173 mph

11.5 L/100 km

20.5 mpg US

24.6 mpg UK

Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8

Power	510 hp 380 kW
0-100 km/h	5.3 s
Top speed Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph

12.5 L/100 km

18.8 mpg US

22.6 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK	4.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK	5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8	230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp	11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8	221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp	12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

PorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8

Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8

Power

500 hp

373 kW

510 hp

380 kW

Torque

700 Nm

516 lb-ft

625 Nm

461 lb-ft

Acceleration

4.7 s

5.3 s

Top speed

278 km/h

173 mph

Unrestricted

235 km/h146 mph

Restricted

225 km/h140 mph

Lightness

2,170 kg

4,784 lb

2,310 kg

5,093 lb

Fuel consumption

11.5 L/100 km

20.5 mpg US

24.6 mpg UK

12.5 L/100 km

18.8 mpg US

22.6 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	670 L 23.7 cu ft
Length	4,846 mm 190.8 in
Height	1,705 mm 67.1 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,850 mm 190.9 in
Height	1,780 mm 70.1 in

Range score

739 km

459 mi

840 km

522 mi

CO2 score

270 g/km

298 g/km

Trunk score

670 L

23.7 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

230 hp/t

172 kW/t

4.3 kg/hp

221 hp/t

165 kW/t

4.5 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8	Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
Consumption	11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK	12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	20.13 LC100 km	21.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	32.39 LC100 mi	35.20 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal	1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	3,019 LC/year	3,281 LC/year