Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166)

AMG ML 63 V8

523 hp5461 ccGasolineAWDTwin-turboSUV2012-2015
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    523 hp
    390 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    223 hp/t
    166 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    276 g/km
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power
523hp390kW
510hp380kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
2,345kg5,170lb
2,310kg5,093lb
Gross weight
3,050kg6,724lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
68.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
64.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
17.7s
Calculated
22.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb
Calculated
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
788km490mi
Calculated
840km522mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,461cc333cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,804mm189in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,926mm76in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,796mm71in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,915mm115in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,648mm65in
-
Rear track
1,663mm65in
-
Trunk volume
690L
-
Max trunk volume
2,010L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
93L
105L
CO2 emissions
276g/km
298g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V85,250-5,750 rpm1,750-5,000 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8-2,500-5,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.7 s
22.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
523 hp
390 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 has 13 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
2,345 kg
5,170 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
2,310 kg
5,093 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V84.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V85.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
223 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
788 km
490 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
840 km
522 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
523 hp
390 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
Power
523 hp
390 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
690 L
24.4 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,796 mm
70.7 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
Power
523 hp
390 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
4.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
223 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power
523 hp
390 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,345 kg
5,170 lb
2,310 kg
5,093 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
690 L
24.4 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,796 mm
70.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
788 km
490 mi
840 km
522 mi
CO2 score
276 g/km
298 g/km
Trunk score
690 L
24.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
223 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km21.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi35.20 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year3,281 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 75 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8

  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG ML 63 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W164)Facelift 2008AMG ML 63 V8
5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
AMG ML 63 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W164)AMG ML 63 V8
5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
AMG ML 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W163)Facelift 2001AMG ML 55 V8
5.0 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
AMG ML 63 V8
AMG ML 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W163)AMG ML 55 V8
5.0 V8
50i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
AMG GLS 63
VS
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63
AMG ML 63 V8
GLS 580 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 580 V8
5.0 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo 4.8 V8
Mercedes-Benz M-class (W166) AMG ML 63 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster