Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014

Turbo 4.8 V8

520 hp4806 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2014-2017
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II

5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    279 km/h
    173 mph
  • Most powerful
    520 hp
    388 kW
  • Highest torque
    750 Nm
    553 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,185 kg
    4,817 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    238 hp/t
    177 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    267 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    870 km
    540 mi
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power
520hp388kW
510hp380kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
2,185kg4,817lb
2,310kg5,093lb
Gross weight
2,895kg6,382lb
-
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
63.6s99% target: 276 km/h / 172 mph
Calculated
64.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.5s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
14.7s
Calculated
22.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
238hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb
Calculated
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
343Nm/t230lb-ft/ton
Calculated
271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
870km540mi
Calculated
840km522mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,806cc293cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,855mm191in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,643mm65in
-
Rear track
1,657mm65in
-
Trunk volume
670L
-
Max trunk volume
1,780L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
100L
105L
CO2 emissions
267g/km
298g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V86,000 rpm2,250-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8-2,500-5,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.5 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.7 s
22.8 s
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
186 km/h
115 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
520 hp
388 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
2,185 kg
4,817 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
2,310 kg
5,093 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
279 km/h
173 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V84.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V85.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
870 km
540 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
840 km
522 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
520 hp
388 kW
4.5 s
279 km/h
173 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
Power
520 hp
388 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
Power
520 hp
388 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
4.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8
Power
520 hp
388 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.5 s
5.3 s
Top speed
279 km/h
173 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
2,185 kg
4,817 lb
2,310 kg
5,093 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
870 km
540 mi
840 km
522 mi
CO2 score
267 g/km
298 g/km
Trunk score
670 L
23.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km21.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi35.20 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year3,281 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 125 Nm more
  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 44 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 30 km (18 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 31 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II Turbo 4.8 V8
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
5.0 V8
90D 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
Turbo 4.8 V8
Turbo 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
5.0 V8
AMG ML 63 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzM-class (W166)AMG ML 63 V8
Turbo 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo S 4.8 V8
5.0 V8
AMG GL 63
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63
Turbo 4.8 V8
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
5.0 V8
50i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
Turbo 4.8 V8
Turbo S 4.5 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo S 4.5 V8
5.0 V8
GTS 3.6 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014GTS 3.6 V6
Turbo 4.8 V8
Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 2014Turbo 4.8 V8vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
5.0 V8
4.4 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 Turbo 4.8 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster