Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions264 g/km
- Best estimated range885 km550 mi
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Lightest2,310 kg5,093 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 456hp340kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 295Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 885km550mi Calculated | 840km522mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,663cc285cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,934mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,850mm73in | 1,780mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 3,075mm121in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | - |
| Trunk volume | 680L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,300L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | 264g/km | 298g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 5,250-5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | - | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 456 hp 340 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 has 54 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 5.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 885 km 550 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 840 km 522 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 456 hp 340 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 500 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport II5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 456 hp 340 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 885 km 550 mi | 840 km 522 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 264 g/km | 298 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 500
- Has 75 Nm more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5.0 V8
- Has 54 hp more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























