Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lightest
    2,146 kg
    4,731 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

  • Most powerful
    339 hp
    253 kW
  • Highest torque
    740 Nm
    546 lb-ft
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    182 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,024 km
    636 mi
  • Largest trunk
    900 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
310hp231kW
339hp253kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
740Nm546lb-ft
Curb weight
2,146kg4,731lb
2,504kg5,520lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
101.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
30.2s
Calculated
35.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
855km532mi
Calculated
1,024km636mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
5,000mm197in
Width
1,923mm76in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,869mm74in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,673mm66in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
220mm9in
Trunk volume
314L
900L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
1,943L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
86L
CO2 emissions
192g/km
182g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.2 s
35.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 has 29 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
740 Nm
546 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
2,504 kg
5,520 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V86.9 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
1,024 km
636 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
2,504 kg
5,520 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in
Range score
855 km
532 mi
1,024 km
636 mi
CO2 score
192 g/km
182 g/km
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 358 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

  • Has 29 hp more
  • Has 340 Nm more
  • Has 168 km (105 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 586 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
4.4 V8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
4.4 V8
75D 75 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsTeslaModel X75D 75 kWh
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
4.4 V8
570 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
4.4 V8
40i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)40i
2.0 T6
30d V6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
4.4 V8
3.6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsCadillacXT53.6
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster