Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8vsLexus LX III · Facelift 2015 570 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LX III · Facelift 2015
570 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lightest2,504 kg5,520 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions182 g/km
- Best estimated range1,024 km636 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score84/100
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Best practicality score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 339hp253kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 740Nm546lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,504kg5,520lb | 2,740kg6,041lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,350kg7,385lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 101.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 109.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 38.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,024km636mi Calculated | 958km595mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,367cc266cu in | 5,663cc346cu in |
| Length | 5,000mm197in | 5,065mm199in |
| Width | 2,073mm82in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,869mm74in | 1,910mm75in |
| Wheelbase | 2,922mm115in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,693mm67in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,635mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 220mm9in | 225mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 900L | 701L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,943L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 138L |
| CO2 emissions | 182g/km | 334g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 38.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has 28 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 2,504 kg 5,520 lb |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 2,740 kg 6,041 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 7.7 s |
Although Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 6.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 1,024 km 636 mi |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 958 km 595 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 339 hp 253 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,504 kg 5,520 lb | 2,740 kg 6,041 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,024 km 636 mi | 958 km 595 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 182 g/km | 334 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | 701 L 24.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 | Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 25.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 3,780 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
- Has 210 Nm more
- Is 236 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 km (41 mi) more estimated range
- Has 199 L more trunk volume
- Emits 152 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8
- Has 28 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























