Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lightest2,504 kg5,520 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,083 km1,295 mi
- Best economy score97/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | 2,504kg5,520lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.1s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 101.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,083km1,295mi Calculated | 1,024km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 5,000mm197in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,777mm70in | 1,869mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | - | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 220mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 900L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,770L | 1,943L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 86L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 182g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 2,620 kg 5,776 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 2,504 kg 5,520 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 5.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 4.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 2,083 km 1,295 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 1,024 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 |
| 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,620 kg 5,776 lb | 2,504 kg 5,520 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.6 L/100 km 65.3 mpg US 78.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,083 km 1,295 mi | 1,024 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 182 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.30 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.14 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 540 L143 US gal119 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 945.00 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 3.0 TFSi V6
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,060 km (658 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
- Has 290 Nm more
- Is 116 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 473 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























