Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8vsCadillac XT5 3.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac XT5
3.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful339 hp253 kW
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions182 g/km
- Best estimated range1,024 km636 mi
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Cadillac XT5 3.6
- Lightest1,931 kg4,257 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | CadillacXT53.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 339hp253kW | 314hp234kW |
| Torque | 740Nm546lb-ft | 368Nm271lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,504kg5,520lb | 1,931kg4,257lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 101.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 36.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,024km636mi Calculated | 830km516mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,367cc266cu in | 3,649cc223cu in |
| Length | 5,000mm197in | 4,815mm190in |
| Width | 2,073mm82in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,869mm74in | 1,675mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,922mm115in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,693mm67in | 1,638mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,638mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 220mm9in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 900L | 850L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,943L | 1,784L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 182g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | CadillacXT53.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 36.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 314 hp 234 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 has 25 hp more than Cadillac XT5 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 2,504 kg 5,520 lb |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 1,931 kg 4,257 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| CadillacXT53.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 1,024 km 636 mi |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 830 km 516 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 314 hp 234 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacXT53.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacXT53.6 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CadillacXT53.6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8 | CadillacXT53.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 339 hp 253 kW | 314 hp 234 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,504 kg 5,520 lb | 1,931 kg 4,257 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,024 km 636 mi | 830 km 516 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 182 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | 850 L 30.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 | Cadillac XT5 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 372 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 194 km (120 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 47 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac XT5 3.6
- Is 573 kg lighter
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























