Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster
Car comparison
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12vsWiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF5
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions299 g/km
- Best estimated range543 km337 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful640 hp477 kW
- Best power-to-weight379 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 640hp477kW | 555hp414kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 51.1s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.2s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 32.3L/100 km7.3mpg US8.7mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 379hp/t282kW/t172hp/1000 lb Calculated | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 391Nm/t261lb-ft/ton Calculated | 463Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 469km292mi Calculated | 543km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,496cc396cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,610mm181in | 4,220mm166in |
| Width | 2,058mm81in | 1,950mm77in |
| Height | 1,135mm45in | 1,180mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,665mm105in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,695mm67in | - |
| Trunk volume | 150L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 495g/km | 299g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 8,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 5,750-6,250 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 10.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 39.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 220 km/h 137 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW |
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12 has 85 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 311 km/h 193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 3.4 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12 and Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12: 8.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 469 km 292 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 543 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.4 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW | 3.9 s | 311 km/h 193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 |
| 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 640 hp 477 kW | 555 hp 414 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 469 km 292 mi | 543 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 495 g/km | 299 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12 | Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.3 L/100 km11 mpg US13.3 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.28 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 59.99 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,195 L844 US gal703 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,591 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12
- Has 85 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 8.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 196 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























