Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster
Car comparison
Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12vsWiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF5
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight378 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions299 g/km
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score72/100
Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful573 hp427 kW
- Best estimated range544 km338 mi
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 573hp427kW | 555hp414kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 51.1s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 344hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 463Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | 543km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | 4,220mm166in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,950mm77in |
| Height | 1,250mm49in | 1,180mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 343g/km | 299g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 6,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 5,750-6,250 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 46.6 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW |
Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12 has 18 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 311 km/h 193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 3.9 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 3.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 544 km 338 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 543 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW | 3.9 s | 311 km/h 193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 573 hp 427 kW | 555 hp 414 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | 543 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 343 g/km | 299 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12 | Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 44 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























