Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197) 6.2 V8vsWiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF5
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight378 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197) 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed317 km/h197 mph
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range644 km400 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 571hp426kW | 555hp414kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | - |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.0s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated | 51.1s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.9s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 344hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 392Nm/t262lb-ft/ton Calculated | 463Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 644km400mi Calculated | 543km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,220mm166in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,950mm77in |
| Height | 1,261mm50in | 1,180mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,682mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 173L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 299g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197) 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 5,750-6,250 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.9 s | 10.8 s |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 571 hp 426 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197) 6.2 V8 has 16 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197) 6.2 V8: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 311 km/h 193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 3.8 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197) 6.2 V8 and Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 644 km 400 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 543 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 571 hp 426 kW | 3.8 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 555 hp 414 kW | 3.9 s | 311 km/h 193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 571 hp 426 kW | 555 hp 414 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 311 km/h 193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 644 km 400 mi | 543 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 299 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 173 L 6.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197) 6.2 V8 | Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG Roadster (R197) 6.2 V8
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























