Car comparison

Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12vsWiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari SA Aperta

6.0 V12

670 hp5999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedRoadster2010-2010
VS

Wiesmann Roadster MF5

4.4 V8

555 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboRoadster2009-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    335 km/h
    208 mph Unrestricted
    325 km/h
    202 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    670 hp
    500 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    420 hp/t
    313 kW/t
    2.4 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    600 km
    373 mi
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best practicality score
    35/100

Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,470 kg
    3,241 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.9 L/100 km
    18.2 mpg US
    21.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    299 g/km
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
Power
670hp500kW
555hp414kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,470kg3,241lb
Gross weight
1,705kg3,759lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Calculated
311 km/h
193 mph
To 99% top speed
52.0s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
51.1s99% target: 308 km/h / 191 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.6s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
9.6s
Calculated
10.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.1s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
420hp/t313kW/t191hp/1000 lb
Calculated
378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
389Nm/t260lb-ft/ton
Calculated
463Nm/t310lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
600km373mi
Calculated
543km337mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,999cc366cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,700mm185in
4,220mm166in
Width
1,962mm77in
1,950mm77in
Height
1,300mm51in
1,180mm46in
Wheelbase
2,750mm108in
2,507mm99in
Front track
1,680mm66in
-
Rear track
1,640mm65in
-
Trunk volume
350L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
105L
70L
CO2 emissions
411g/km
299g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
  • Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V128,250 rpm6,500 rpm8,500 rpm
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V85,750-6,250 rpm1,500-5,650 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.6 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.6 s
10.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
36.1 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Likely limited
311 km/h
193 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.4 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.1 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
218 km/h
135 mph
208 km/h
129 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
670 hp
500 kW
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
555 hp
414 kW

Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12 has 115 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12: 115 hp (86 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
1,470 kg
3,241 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
311 km/h
193 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V123.6 s
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V83.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12 and Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
17.5 L/100 km
13.4 mpg US
16.1 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 and Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12: 4.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
420 hp/t
313 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
600 km
373 mi
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
543 km
337 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
670 hp
500 kW
3.6 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
555 hp
414 kW
3.9 s
311 km/h
193 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
Power
670 hp
500 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,700 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
Power
555 hp
414 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,220 mm
166.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
Power
670 hp
500 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
17.5 L/100 km
13.4 mpg US
16.1 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
Power
555 hp
414 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
311 km/h
193 mph
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
17.5 L/100 km
13.4 mpg US
16.1 mpg UK
3.6 s
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12
420 hp/t
313 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
17.5 L/100 km
13.4 mpg US
16.1 mpg UK
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8
Power
670 hp
500 kW
555 hp
414 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.6 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
311 km/h
193 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,470 kg
3,241 lb
Fuel consumption
17.5 L/100 km
13.4 mpg US
16.1 mpg UK
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,700 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,220 mm
166.1 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
Range score
600 km
373 mi
543 km
337 mi
CO2 score
411 g/km
299 g/km
Trunk score
350 L
12.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
420 hp/t
313 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
378 hp/t
282 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
Consumption17.5 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km30.63 LC100 km22.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi49.29 LC100 mi36.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,625 L693 US gal577 UK gal1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,594 LC/year3,386 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12

  • Has 115 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 57 km (36 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Uses 4.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 112 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12
Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 V12
6.0 V12
VS
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12vsFerrari599 GTO6.0 V12
4.4 V8
Performante 5.2
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 570-4 SpyderPerformante 5.2
6.0 V12
6.0 V12
VS
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12vsFerrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12
4.4 V8
5.2 V10
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 560-4 Spyder5.2 V10
6.0 V12
722 S 5.5 V8 Kompressor
VS
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12vsMercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (R199)722 S 5.5 V8 Kompressor
4.4 V8
6.2 V8
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)6.2 V8
6.0 V12
6.5 V12
VS
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12vsLamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12
4.4 V8
5.2
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 550-2 Spyder5.2
6.0 V12
3.8 V8
VS
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12vsMcLarenMP4-12C Spider3.8 V8
6.0 V12
CAN-AM 3.8 V8
VS
FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12vsMcLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8
4.4 V8
S 6.0 V12
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8vsAston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12
4.4 V8
AMG SL 63
VS
WiesmannRoadster MF54.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12 vs Wiesmann Roadster MF5 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster