Ferrari SA Aperta
Car comparison
Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12vsMcLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren 650S Spider
CAN-AM 3.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Highest torque678 Nm500 lb-ft
- Lightest1,468 kg3,236 lb
- Best power-to-weight443 hp/t330 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions275 g/km
- Best estimated range615 km382 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score75/100
Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Most powerful670 hp500 kW
- Best practicality score35/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670hp500kW | 650hp485kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 678Nm500lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,468kg3,236lb |
| Gross weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.0s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 50.3s99% target: 326 km/h / 202 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.6s Calculated | 8.6s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 10.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 420hp/t313kW/t191hp/1000 lb Calculated | 443hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 389Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated | 462Nm/t309lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | 615km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,999cc366cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,700mm185in | - |
| Width | 1,962mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,750mm108in | - |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,640mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 105L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 411g/km | 275g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 8,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.6 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 36.1 s | 41.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 10.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 670 hp 500 kW |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12 has 20 hp more than McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8 and Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 1,468 kg 3,236 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 329 km/h 204 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 3.6 s |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 3.0 s |
Although Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12 has more power, McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8 and Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 17.5 L/100 km 13.4 mpg US 16.1 mpg UK |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8 and Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12: 5.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 420 hp/t 313 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 443 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 600 km 373 mi |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 615 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 670 hp 500 kW | 3.6 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 3.0 s | 329 km/h 204 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 |
| 17.5 L/100 km 13.4 mpg US 16.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 17.5 L/100 km 13.4 mpg US 16.1 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | 420 hp/t 313 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 17.5 L/100 km 13.4 mpg US 16.1 mpg UK |
| McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | 443 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariSA Aperta6.0 V12 | McLaren650S SpiderCAN-AM 3.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp 500 kW | 650 hp 485 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,468 kg 3,236 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.5 L/100 km 13.4 mpg US 16.1 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | 615 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 411 g/km | 275 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 420 hp/t 313 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 443 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12 | McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.5 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 30.63 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 49.29 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,625 L693 US gal577 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,594 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari SA Aperta 6.0 V12
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
McLaren 650S Spider CAN-AM 3.8 V8
- Has 58 Nm more
- Is 127 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 136 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























