Lamborghini Murcielago LP640
Car comparison
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48VvsLamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster
6.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed338 km/h210 mph
- Most powerful640 hp477 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score50/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Best power-to-weight379 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption21.3 L/100 km11.0 mpg US13.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption32.3 L/100 km7.3 mpg US8.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range469 km292 mi
- Largest trunk150 L
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 640hp477kW | 640hp477kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.9s99% target: 335 km/h / 208 mph Calculated | 49.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.2s Calculated | 9.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 32.3L/100 km7.3mpg US8.7mpg UK | 32.3L/100 km7.3mpg US8.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated | 379hp/t282kW/t172hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 361Nm/t241lb-ft/ton Calculated | 391Nm/t261lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 469km292mi Calculated | 469km292mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,496cc396cu in | 6,496cc396cu in |
| Length | 4,610mm181in | 4,610mm181in |
| Width | 2,058mm81in | 2,058mm81in |
| Height | 1,135mm45in | 1,135mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,665mm105in | 2,665mm105in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,695mm67in | 1,695mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 150L |
| Max trunk volume | 140L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 495g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 8,000 rpm | - | 8,250 rpm |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 8,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 34.0 s | 39.1 s |
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 640 hp 477 kW |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 338 km/h 210 mph |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 3.4 s |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 3.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 469 km 292 mi |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 469 km 292 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.4 s | 338 km/h 210 mph |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.4 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V |
| 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 |
| 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 640 hp 477 kW | 640 hp 477 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 469 km 292 mi | 469 km 292 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 495 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V | Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.3 L/100 km11 mpg US13.3 mpg UK | 21.3 L/100 km11 mpg US13.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.29 LC100 km | 37.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 60.02 LC100 mi | 59.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,197 L844 US gal703 UK gal | 3,195 L844 US gal703 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,594 LC/year | 5,591 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Uses 0.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 0 km (0 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























