Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster
Car comparison
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12vsLamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Murcielago
6.2 V12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful640 hp477 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight379 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption32.3 L/100 km7.3 mpg US8.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk150 L
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score50/100
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best overall score71/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 640hp477kW | 580hp433kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 56.5s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.2s Calculated | 10.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 32.3L/100 km7.3mpg US8.7mpg UK | 32.6L/100 km7.2mpg US8.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 379hp/t282kW/t172hp/1000 lb Calculated | 352hp/t262kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 391Nm/t261lb-ft/ton Calculated | 394Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 469km292mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,496cc396cu in | 6,192cc378cu in |
| Length | 4,610mm181in | 4,580mm180in |
| Width | 2,058mm81in | 2,045mm81in |
| Height | 1,135mm45in | 1,140mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,665mm105in | 2,665mm105in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,695mm67in | 1,695mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 150L | 140L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | 495g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 8,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 7,500 rpm | 5,400 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 10.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 39.1 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 220 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 580 hp 433 kW |
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12 has 60 hp more than Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V and Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 3.4 s |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12 and Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 352 hp/t 262 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.4 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 580 hp 433 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniMurcielago LP640 Roadster6.5 V12 | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 640 hp 477 kW | 580 hp 433 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 469 km 292 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 495 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 352 hp/t 262 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.3 L/100 km11 mpg US13.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 59.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,195 L844 US gal703 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,591 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 Roadster 6.5 V12
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V
- Is 40 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























