Car comparison

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8vsKoenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Koenigsegg CCX

R 4.8 V8

1032 hp4800 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turbo2007-2010
VS

Koenigsegg CC8S

4.7 i V8 32V

655 hp4700 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2002-2003

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Most powerful
    1,032 hp
    770 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,080 Nm
    797 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    776 hp/t
    579 kW/t
    1.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    120 L
  • Best economy score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
Power
1,032hp770kW
655hp488kW
Torque
1,080Nm797lb-ft
750Nm553lb-ft
Curb weight
1,330kg2,932lb
1,175kg2,590lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
390 km/h
242 mph
To 99% top speed
94.3s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
50.8s99% target: 386 km/h / 240 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.9s
3.5s
0-200 km/h
8.8s
8.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.8s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
10.5s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
776hp/t579kW/t352hp/1000 lb
Calculated
557hp/t416kW/t253hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
812Nm/t543lb-ft/ton
Calculated
638Nm/t427lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
318km198mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
4,800cc293cu in
4,700cc287cu in
Length
4,293mm169in
4,190mm165in
Width
1,996mm79in
1,990mm78in
Height
1,114mm44in
1,070mm42in
Wheelbase-
2,660mm105in
Ground clearance
100mm4in
-
Trunk volume
120L
-
Max trunk volume-
120L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
70L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32VPowerTorque
  • Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V87,000 rpm5,600 rpm7,250 rpm
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V6,800 rpm5,000 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.8 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.9 s
3.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
8.8 s
8.3 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
25.7 s
19.7 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
390 km/h
242 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.9 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.9 s
9.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.5 s
10.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
221 km/h
137 mph
237 km/h
147 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,032 hp
770 kW
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
655 hp
488 kW

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 has 377 hp more than Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 377 hp (281 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,080 Nm
797 lb-ft
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
750 Nm
553 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
1,175 kg
2,590 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
400 km/h
249 mph
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
390 km/h
242 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V82.9 s
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V3.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 and Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
776 hp/t
579 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
557 hp/t
416 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,032 hp
770 kW
2.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
655 hp
488 kW
3.5 s
390 km/h
242 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Power
1,032 hp
770 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,114 mm
43.9 in
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
Power
655 hp
488 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
390 km/h
242 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,070 mm
42.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
Power
1,032 hp
770 kW
655 hp
488 kW
Torque
1,080 Nm
797 lb-ft
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.9 s
3.5 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
390 km/h
242 mph
Lightness
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
Fuel consumption
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,114 mm
43.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,070 mm
42.1 in
Range score
318 km
198 mi
-
Trunk score
120 L
4.2 cu ft
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
776 hp/t
579 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
557 hp/t
416 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKoenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
Consumption22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km38.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi61.96 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,775 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8

  • Has 377 hp more
  • Has 330 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 218 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R 4.8 V8
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8vsKoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
5.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
S 5.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8vsKoenigseggAgeraS 5.0 V8
4.7 i V8 32V
4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
R 4.8 V8
5.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8vsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
4.7 i V8 32V
6.0 V12
VS
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VvsFerrariEnzo6.0 V12
R 4.8 V8
4.0 V8
VS
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8vsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
4.7 i V8 32V
6.0 V12
VS
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VvsMaseratiMC126.0 V12
R 4.8 V8
90 kWh
VS
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8vsRimacConcept One90 kWh
4.7 i V8 32V
722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor
VS
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)722 Edition 5.5 V8 Kompressor
R 4.8 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8vsBugattiChiron8.0 W16
4.7 i V8 32V
7.3 i V12 48V
VS
KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32VvsPaganiZonda C127.3 i V12 48V
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 vs Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster