Car comparison

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16vsKoenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bugatti Chiron

8.0 W16

1500 hp7993 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2016-present
VS

Koenigsegg CCX

R 4.8 V8

1032 hp4800 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turbo2007-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    420 km/h
    261 mph
  • Most powerful
    1,500 hp
    1,119 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,600 Nm
    1,180 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    15.2 L/100 km
    15.5 mpg US
    18.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    444 km
    276 mi
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8

  • Lightest
    1,330 kg
    2,932 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    776 hp/t
    579 kW/t
    1.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    22.0 L/100 km
    10.7 mpg US
    12.8 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best economy score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBugattiChiron8.0 W16KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Power
1,500hp1,119kW
1,032hp770kW
Torque
1,600Nm1,180lb-ft
1,080Nm797lb-ft
Curb weight
1,995kg4,398lb
1,330kg2,932lb
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
400 km/h
249 mph
To 99% top speed
56.7s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph
Calculated
94.3s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.5s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
6.5s
8.8s
0-60 mph
2.4s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK
22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
35.2L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK
18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
9.6s
Calculated
10.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb
Calculated
776hp/t579kW/t352hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton
Calculated
812Nm/t543lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
444km276mi
Calculated
318km198mi
Calculated
Displacement
7,993cc488cu in
4,800cc293cu in
Length
4,544mm179in
4,293mm169in
Width
2,038mm80in
1,996mm79in
Height
1,212mm48in
1,114mm44in
Wheelbase
2,711mm107in
-
Ground clearance-
100mm4in
Trunk volume-
120L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
100L
70L
CO2 emissions
516g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8PowerTorque
  • Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16: Power / Torque
  • Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BugattiChiron8.0 W166,700 rpm2,000-6,000 rpm6,950 rpm
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V87,000 rpm5,600 rpm7,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBugattiChiron8.0 W16KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.4 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.5 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
6.5 s
8.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
15.9 s
25.7 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
400 km/h
249 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.7 s
330 ft
101 m
4.3 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.4 s
6.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.1 s
8.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
9.6 s
10.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
252 km/h
157 mph
221 km/h
137 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,032 hp
770 kW

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 has 468 hp more than Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 and Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16: 468 hp (349 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,080 Nm
797 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,330 kg
2,932 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
420 km/h
261 mph
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
400 km/h
249 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W162.5 s
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V82.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 and Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
752 hp/t
561 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
776 hp/t
579 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
444 km
276 mi
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
318 km
198 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
2.5 s
420 km/h
261 mph
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
1,032 hp
770 kW
2.9 s
400 km/h
249 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
Power
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
0-100 km/h2.5 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,544 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,212 mm
47.7 in
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Power
1,032 hp
770 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,114 mm
43.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
Power
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
0-100 km/h2.5 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Power
1,032 hp
770 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
2.5 s
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK
2.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
752 hp/t
561 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
776 hp/t
579 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBugattiChiron8.0 W16KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
Power
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
1,032 hp
770 kW
Torque
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
1,080 Nm
797 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.5 s
2.9 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
400 km/h
249 mph
Lightness
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
1,330 kg
2,932 lb
Fuel consumption
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
22.0 L/100 km
10.7 mpg US
12.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,544 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,212 mm
47.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,114 mm
43.9 in
Range score
444 km
276 mi
318 km
198 mi
CO2 score
516 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
752 hp/t
561 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
776 hp/t
579 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBugatti Chiron 8.0 W16Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
Consumption22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km39.38 LC100 km38.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi63.37 LC100 mi61.96 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,375 L892 US gal742 UK gal3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,906 LC/year5,775 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16

  • Has 468 hp more
  • Has 520 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 126 km (78 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8

  • Is 665 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 vs Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster