Koenigsegg CCX
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8vsKoenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKoenigsegg CCR
4.7 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
- Lightest1,180 kg2,601 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range471 km292 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score61/100
- Best practicality score37/100
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed400 km/h249 mph
- Most powerful1,032 hp770 kW
- Highest torque1,080 Nm797 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight776 hp/t579 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk120 L
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032hp770kW | 806hp601kW |
| Torque | 1,080Nm797lb-ft | 919Nm678lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,180kg2,601lb |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.3s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated | 46.5s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.8s | 7.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 3.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.5s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 776hp/t579kW/t352hp/1000 lb Calculated | 683hp/t509kW/t310hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 812Nm/t543lb-ft/ton Calculated | 779Nm/t521lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 318km198mi Calculated | 471km292mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,800cc293cu in | 4,719cc288cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,293mm169in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,114mm44in | 1,020mm40in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,660mm105in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 120L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 6,900 rpm | 5,700 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 3.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 25.7 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.5 s | 10.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 221 km/h 137 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 806 hp 601 kW |
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 has 226 hp more than Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 226 hp (169 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,080 Nm 797 lb-ft |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 919 Nm 678 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 395 km/h 245 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 2.9 s |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 3.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 and Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 776 hp/t 579 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 318 km 198 mi |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 471 km 292 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 2.9 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 806 hp 601 kW | 3.2 s | 395 km/h 245 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
| 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V |
| 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 776 hp/t 579 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK |
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 806 hp 601 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,080 Nm 797 lb-ft | 919 Nm 678 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 395 km/h 245 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 318 km 198 mi | 471 km 292 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 776 hp/t 579 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 | Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK | 17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 38.50 LC100 km | 29.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 61.96 LC100 mi | 47.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal | 2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,775 LC/year | 4,463 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
- Has 226 hp more
- Has 161 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 93 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 152 km (95 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























